Fatherhood and handling of a girl child: A small autoethnographic account

-

Fatherhood and handling of a girl child: A small autoethnographic account 

by

Ankita Majumder


Why my every step has to be approved by you?

Why my word has to have your permission first?

Why my every plan has to be first agreed upon by you?

Why my every decision has be to edited by you?

Why is it that I have to listen to your every command without voicing my thoughts into it?

Why my action has to be viewed by you?

Why the string of my life isn’t in my hands but in yours?

Why father? Why?

I know what you think, you think of me as a girl and an immature girl.

Just because I’m a girl, I can’t go alone?

Just because I’m a girl, I can’t talk to people?

Just because I’m a girl, I can’t walk on road?

Just because I’m a girl, I can’t handle myself?

Why can’t you trust me? Maybe its because of this I have become an overthinker. Whenever I talk to people I am compelled to think a lot.

 

Just because in the past and still now, I’ve to rethink about my words many times before I can speak about it. I have gained this habit of overthinking about everything. Before even asking someone a question I start to think of every possible situation that could occur so that it won’t surprise me or disheartened me much.

 

I can never agree to my friends’ plans before asking for permission from father. It often gets rejected.

 

I can never say yes for the first time to anything as it has to be approved by the father first. I can’t even make my choice of hairstyle just because he doesn’t like it.

I always have wanted to live life with freedom but could never do so as my neck is tightly held from the behind by him. It was as if my arms and legs are tightly tied to a rope. It was as if there were wired connections running through my entire body, the controller of which is in his hands.

He says that he is being worried for me but then why can’t you believe me when I say I can ha
ndle myself? He says he is protecting me then why can’t you understand the fact that your protectiveness is becoming suffocation for me?

Pic: The Soup for WECKER Picasso's blue period (Click here for source)

There were many decisions in my life that I took under his control and then later on I was the one who was blamed for it. Why? You’re the one who forced me to take that decision then why are you now blaming me for taking that decision?

Why does your protective nature make me feel like suffocation now? Is it my age with which I am supposed to enjoy a degree of freedom?


Click here for a PDF copy of the article

 Ethnographic Experience


 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tarak Chandra Das: the worst sufferer of academic amnesia in Indian Anthropology

-
Image
  Tarak Chandra Das: The worst sufferer of academic amnesia in Indian Anthropology by Prof. Abhijit Guha Amnesia The celebrated sociologist and social anthropologist André Béteille in one of his articles published in the Sociological Bulletin in 1997 wrote: In India, each generation of sociologists seems eager to start its work on a clean slate, with little or no attention to the work done before. This amnesia about the work of their predecessors is no less distinctive of Indian sociologists than their failure to innovate (Béteille 1997:98).   Béteille’s observation on Indian sociologists however, was not novel. About twenty five years before his pronouncement a doyen of Indian anthropology, Surajit Sinha in his insightful article published in the Journal of the Indian anthropological Society (hereafter JIAS ) observed that despite considerable growth in research publications and professional manpower in social and cultural anthropology during the last 100 years the Indian
Read more

Public anthropology in practice

-
Image
  Public anthropology in practice   By Prof. Abhijit Guha     BACKGROUND   A.L. Kroeber (1876-1960) in his essay Eighteen Professions published in the American Anthropologist in 1915 began with two interesting paragraphs. I quote:   Anthropology today includes two studies which fundamental differences of aim and method render irreconcilable. One of those branches is biological and psychological; the other, social or historical (Kroeber 1915).   The second paragraph starts with a more interesting sentence, which runs as follows:   There is a third field, the special province of anthropology, concerned with the relation of biological and social factors. This is no-man’s land, and therefore used as a picnic-ground by whosoever prefers pleasure excursions to the work of cultivating a patch of understanding. Some day this tract will also be surveyed, fenced and improved (Ibid).   Yes, Kroeber was right and he came to anthropology from another subject like hi
Read more

National colloquium on "Metamorphoses of the Political: Voices from the Margins of West Bengal"

-
Image
  The Department of Anthropology in collaboration with ICAS:MP or the M.S. Merian - R. Tagore International Centre of Advanced Studies - an Indo-German research Collaboration has organised a two-day research colloquim "Metamorphoses of the Political: Voices from the Margins of West Bengal".  The concept note is as follows The department was fortunate enough to get some of the most important intellectual personalities working on West Bengal today. See below. However, they have worked as discussants to improve already well researched articles prepared by a bunch of young scholars on the caste questions see below: The department is indebted to all the committee members (as follows): The aim of this workshop was to go beyond the two major theoretical positions, first, the Bengal exceptionalism which claims that caste question is never the political dynamics of West Bengal, and second, a conception that caste question ends at Matua or Rajbanshi movements only. Instead the paper pr
Read more